Work, Learning and Life

“Buy this car to drive to work,  drive to work to pay for this car”

Metric “Handshake

 

So, a few days ago I was reading the first chapter of “The Problem of Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries” by Kathi Weeks and I had one of those uncomfortable parenting moments when you realize the incongruencies and hypocrisies between the theoretical ideals and philosophical musings which you think you hold and the everyday practices and conversations which you engage in.

In the text, Weeks (2011) asks the reader to question the logic of work and to consider for a moment why we are so inattentive to the endeavor of work given: the time dedicated to training as well as searching and preparing for work; the centrality of work in our identity and morality, the significance in our class and political formation; the impact of work status on eligibility to health care, pensions and income support; and that it is literally how most of us  ‘earn’ our living. While Weeks’ arguments are presented as provocative, they are not unfamiliar, with threads of the discourse found within both popular culture and academia. Our year of sabbatical was, if nothing else, a conscious step off the treadmill of work and school, a time of questioning and recognition of the place work holds in our lives.

“Raising children with the attributes that will secure them forms of employment that can match if not surpass the class standing of their parents is the gold star of parenting.” (Week, 2011 p.6)

Pause. 

Our eldest is now 19 years old, a high school graduate that found little validation in his public school experience. Since leaving the hollow halls of “formal” learning he has been engaged in numerous gig positions, picking up enough seasonal and contract work to cobble together part-time work. During non-waged hours he contributes to various home-tasks (reproductive work) that frees labour and boosts the productivity of our (the parents) work. He provides technical assistance within the home and voluntarily offers his knowledge and skills for free within our community and to his online peers. He is the creator and encourager of music, graphic art and media production. And, this was/ is achieved through substantial and sustained self-directed learning in response to problems he wants to solve and visions he wants to create. If work achieves something, involves a challenge and requires effort and persistence (Cairns & Malloch, 2011), then I can say he is working full-time. And if training adds value to the worker (McPherson & Wang, 2014), that engagement in social practices and problem solving is learning (Billett, 2004)  and that leisure allows for schooling in the important pursuits, as suggested in Cairns & Malloch (2011), then I can also say he is both learning and  preparing for the future. 

And yet…. 

Too often and too easily we, his parents, slip into conversations: inquiring about job openings, suggesting potential training programs, nudging towards further educational opportunities and/or encouraging (pushing?) him to be more productive with his “what we will” time – this last conversation most likely entered  when we ourselves are feeling overworked or time crunched. There is, upon reflection, a frightening regularity  and predictability to these largely one-way conversations.

Ummm, what is driving this? 

As parents and educators, we have often been openly and honestly critical of formal education for; its homogenizing effect; false narrative of meritocracy; emphatic focus on individualism; and for what Mojab (2009) refers to as the “…normalisation of capitalist relations” (p.7). Yet I think we are also challenged to envision what exists outside this model of formalized training/schooling for work. Or perhaps rather, we do envision alternative structures, however, there is perceived safety in the standard. There are the “what if’s”. If we don’t nurture/encourage/expect/demand the attributes of employability, what kind of future will said son have? How will we be judged or held to account as guardians? 

I wonder, to what extent these conversations are driven by gendered ideas of work? While Weeks’ argues there is a “…marginalization and an underestimation of unwaged forms of reproductive labour…(p.13) she also suggests that there is a sanctification of feminized forms of labour and I will add a cultural narrative of the helpful female volunteer (See Desire for Development: Whiteness, Gender, and the Helping Imperative). While it is still culturally tolerated for a young woman to live at home to ‘help’ parents and the community, in preparation for the duties found in marriage and childrearing, young men are expected to practice being ‘breadwinners’ and ‘providers’, with no need for practicing domesticity. Would extended family question him less about future plans and current waged work if he was female?

Is there an element of envy and resentment present in these conversations? As a member of our family, our son is afforded what is essentially a basic income. He is able to cover the cost of some essentials and he knows that regardless of fluctuations in hours or wages, that his basic needs/cost (shelter, food) are secure. This basic income affords, as earlier shared, a very different engagement in work, learning and life, one that is: void of overwork; open to the sharing rather than selling of skills; and more self-guided and intrinsically motivated. Are we jealous of this ‘luxury’? Do we, (not) so secretly wish to engage less in work and a little more in “…creative activity, not only to make commodities but to remake a world” (Weeks, 2011 p.19). If so, what is it exactly that is preventing us from pulling back? Do we fear the world being remade by youth? Do we (un)consciously believe that those not consumed in waged work are ‘not pulling their weight’?

The current pandemic has offered a socially acceptable excuse for some to engage in work in a different way. For the moment it is ‘normal’ to have reduced hours, work part-time or to question the logic and feasibility of education/training for work. But if scholars, such as Guy Standing are correct, the precarity evident during the pandemic is not new but rather a growing feature of our society.  In such an environment, even the best of parents may not achieve their gold star. What does that mean for how we organize our family units and communities? Our relationships with one another?

 

References

Billet, S. (2004). ‘Workplace participatory practices,’ Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 6, 312-324.

Cairns, L. & Mallock, M. (2011). Introduction: Theories of work, place, and learning: New directions in The Sage Handbook of Workplace Learning. London: Sage, pgs. 3-16.

Heron, B. (2007). Desire for Development: The Education of White Women as Development Workers, Wilfrid Laurier University Press

McPherson, R. & Wang, J. (2014). Low -income low-qualified employees’ access to workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning,  26 (6/7), pp 349-363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2013-0069

Mojab, S. (2009). Turning work and lifelong learning inside out: A Marxist-Feminist attempt. In L. Cooper & S. Walters (Eds.), Learning/Work: Turning work and lifelong learning inside out. Cape Town: HSRC Press. Pgs. 4-15.

Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Weeks, K. (2011). The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

Thinking about Graphic Text;

So the other day I was listening to a podcast that moved from the origins of speech bubbles to a more general conversation around graphic text and  the good and bad design of graphics

Speech Bubbles: Understanding Comics with Scott McCloud

Which got me thinking about the graphic text that surrounds me, how I use it to create meaning while we travel and the impact this might have for learning and teaching, especially in ELL environments.

Six months in to our travels it has come to my attention that using a public toilet in most countries requires some sort of directions. The instructions vary widely from place to place as do the graphics.. In the Kuala Lumpur airport, a Hello Kitty styled comic shares the ins and outs of bathroom use and etiquette, while in  Cambodia thick lined, black and white graphics are preferred. Regardless of the style and format, some cultural or social awareness is required to decode the message even for such routine tasks.

Language teachers, especially those who work with literacy learners, use graphics and images to support meaning. I suspect, at times, we over estimating our learners ability to clearly read  the graphic we present and/or to read the graphic through the necessary cultural lens

NoDurians.svg

By KenshirohOwn work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

Is it medieval weapons, gernades or spiky balloons that are not allowed in my hotel room?

Responsible travel: paradox or oxymoron?

We are parents and educators. Responsibility is our middle names and so naturally, in the course of this journey, we did a little research into the topic of responsible and ethical travel. A quick search brings up numerous articles and manifestos with pretty consistent messaging  (one of the more comprehensive examples can be found at https://epicureandculture.com/ethical-travel/ ) Much of the advice seems to be common sense. Yet moving  from Japan to Russia to Vietnam to Indonesia we find ourselves from time to time in uncomfortable situations wondering, silently and aloud,  if the path of responsible and ethical wandering is as straight or simple as sold.

It was in Can Tho, Vietnam  we decided to take a tour through the Mekong. We looked around, chose a small boat and local guide recommended through the family run hotel we were staying at. We passed on the option to have lunch in a “traditional village” or to partake in any activities involving photos with endangered species. According to our research we were being “good tourists”.

Our tour of the Mekong started at 5:00 am. We walked through the dark streets carrying our sunrise breakfast wrapped in cellophane packages and plastic bags. Our tour included visits to two water markets and a rice noodle factory. Our guide was Xan, a law students from the nearby university who was preparing for an articling position. We traveled an hour up the river with the rising sun, getting glimpses at the “back porches” and homes of those living and working along the river’s bank, stopping occasionally to cut plastic bags or fishing line from the boat’s propeller. We watched  the exchange of goods at the large wholesale water market and sampled seasonal fruit before being taken to see two noodle “factories”.

The first noodle joint was a family operated affair where a father and son were mixing, stirring, cooking and setting rice pancakes out to dry. We were able to see the ingredients, ask some questions and learn about the preparation process.In this building of corrugated metal the family burned rice husks and free  “cotton scraps”acquired from nearby clothing manufacturing. The free fuel, much of it synthetic, is the byproduct of  a textile industry that has moved from China to Vietnam in search of cheaper labour. The fuel reduces output costs and saves landfill space but creates a toxic smoke that impacts the health of the family. A new locally made “Northface ” knock off hangs from our shoulders.

We then walked to a second site, a large, airy compound designed specifically to allow tourist  an interactive authentic experience.Here all the noodles were made by smiling women and only rice husks were burned.  Xan noted, “tourists don’t like the black smoke of free fuel.”  

Later as we visited a second, smaller floating market, Xan shared that the government gives incentives, such as free electricity, to floating market sellers as the markets are such an important tourist attraction and source of local revenue. On the day we visited, the number of tourist boats experiencing the market equaled those of merchants and buyers and this was in the off season. What would be the gain and/or the loss to the merchants and customers, communities and/or environment if the river markets  evolved without government subsidies? Is tourism preserving or stagnating communities? Do the markets represent an authentic  or contrived experience?

From the Mekong Delta we traveled by every mode of local transport possible to reach the quiet beaches of Phu Quoc. This was our first “resort” experience. The White Lotus, like many others in the area, is a recently built family affair, consisting of a dozen small bungalows separated by hibiscus, palms, jasmine and banana trees. With a restaurant, pool, a few residential pets, a generous breakfast and kind staff, it was my kids vision of heaven. It is a business  trying very hard to set itself apart from similar places  popping up in the area, largely through high ratings on internet booking sites. Any hostel/guesthouse/hotel/restaurant with a decent travel rating is sure to advertise the fact.  And managers at such places constantly tweek service in response to customer feedback, “The too Asian breakfast” leads to the availability of pancakes every morning and a general blanding of flavour , “hot water issues” are solved with a generator that loudly kicks on when the island’s power crashes, and the “staff can’t speak English” might mean changing hiring practices. In Phuc Quoc we needed to ask for chopsticks and spoons and chilies as forks and knives and ketchup just don’t work so well for the ubiquitous fried rice. What is fair for a tourist to expect from a hotel or a restaurant? When does the expectation of service cross into entitlement? What impact does the world of reviews have on tourism, service,  communities, and environment?

In booking accommodations for our return to Saigon we looked for something more residential, outside the center of the back packers/ tourist attraction site zone and the weirdness  travelers create when food, drink and spa treatments are a ¼ of the price “back home”. Our thinking was an apartment would allow us to buy groceries at the market, cook a little, and explore some more everyday sights.

That is how we found ourselves in a gated community of brand new high rises with all the amenities of an upscale development- pools, parks, cafes, convenience stores and gyms in every building, vast green gardens, an army of cleaners, branded taxis waiting and security on every curb, a private school and international hospital. Heck, cars even stopped for pedestrians here. It felt a little like the set of “The Giver” or “Hunger Games”. From the 33rd floor, we looked down and over the city. It is easy to see the next cluster of streets in line  to be razed by the bulldozer. Actually walk out the gate and you realized, the exterior  walls of this planned community are lined with the temporary corrugated tin structures of construction labour, the curbs littered with refuse and the  convenient multi lane freeway difficult to cross. This was also one of the easiest places to meet locals in a non commercial exchange setting. Was this a local,typical and/or authentic experience?   Was this a glimpse into the new Vietnam, a westernized Vietnam, both or neither?

Now we are in Bali for a month. A beautiful, lush Indonesian island that sees 5 million tourists a year. Mount Agung is spewing ash and  100,000 Balinese are in need of evacuation, facing the possible loss of homes, incomes, communities and religious sites. Yet it is the tragedy of cancelled holiday flights and lost revenue that occupies the media coverage here and abroad. Should things become more serious, what role/steps if any could or should we take in response? In an emergency, how might the presence of mass numbers of foreigners impact response and resource allocation? 

This journey, like parenthood,  didn’t come with directions, just a lot of advice and well wishes. We are figuring it out as we go along. We don’t always  know what to do or always feel comfortable with the choices we make on the road. We don’t always understand at the time (if ever) the implications of our choices and on what and whom. We recognize it is privilege that has made travel possible and whether we like to admit it or not, as travelers we feel entitled to certain standards or opportunities or experiences. While top 10 lists with easy to check boxes might bring us some comfort we will need to dig a little bit deeper than google to work through how to be responsible and ethical travelers.

Changing Directions

New and unfamiliar experiences can often be scary or startling to say the least. When we arrived In Hanoi, Vietnam I immediately knew it was different from Canada. The smells of the city were different, the noise was different, and even the architecture was different, and by the time we arrived at our hotel I was already very familiarized with the city. One of the first things that became clear was that this largely populated city has such a huge contrast of smells, some delightful some revolting, some of which include exhaust, rotting jackfruit  and delicious noodle soup known as Pho. When we were in Russia I thought that the crazy roller coaster like taxi rides were exciting. But crossing the street in Hanoi was much more exciting, and scary. The comparison feels like comparing a chihuahua dog to a pack of bloodthirsty wolves. Part of the reason that it was so hard to cross the street is because there is like a bazillion motorcycles honking and zooming around everywhere. -Kalle

A whole lot of learning…

happens when you are motivated.

Anton has used YouTube and online tutorials to learn parkour.

In Japan Anton met others who share his interest. Teaching each other moves and copying lines became the lingua franca.

This video is Anton’s first attempt at using Adobe Creative editing software.

It is his interest in this sport that ages us rapidly.

 

Freedom

 

Harvest Festival, Hiroshima

Our kids have been raised to be somewhat free range. From a young age, they have walked to school independently, been encouraged to play at the local parks “unsupervised”, cared for themselves after school and roamed the neighbourhood on wheels of all types. With each passing year, their range has grown from the schoolyard playground, to music lessons and confirmation classes, to the city bike trails and malls. No doubt they have had some (mis)adventures and hopefully learning a few lessons along the way.

Now on our travels, suddenly our kids are under close 24/7 surveillance by parents who are “home all day”, around every corner, always within earshot and who no longer know the cultural rules and expectations. The luxury of opportunities for sorting a dispute between themselves or climbing a favourite tree for some quiet contemplation, to be privately silly and ridiculous in a way that most adults find annoying, or to creatively solve a problem in a questionable manner is greatly diminished. Now “The Parents” are always present to ask, to mediate or to consult, to censure, redirect, caution and intervene or to defer responsibility to. Both they and we can find this taxing from time to time. The voice of conscience in not just in the back of their mind, it is literally over their shoulder, and the need to negotiate and build sibling/peer relationships independently is now subject to parent proxy as we are called in to be judge or referee. We have become the sounding board for all decisions and actions where previously they may have had to struggle with and sort out their choices on their own before taking action. The check in is more external than internal.  

Our kids also don’t have the connections or know the resources of the community to call upon in case of emergency, the eyes of neighbours to watch and protect them or even a home number to memorize and easily access in case of separation. The scope and context of contingency planning is different. They live in the public, sharing living spaces in hostels, guest houses and tiny apartments, traveling by bus, train, ferry and subway surrounded by strangers and the hum of another cultural, social and bureaucratic machine. And there seem no other children their age present to be cultural references or role models. So they are kept very close and they are asked to behave for many hours a day in a way that is respectful to the community we are visiting. We have become cultural mediators and shortcuts to understanding. What is considered clean or dirty, rude or appropriate, too loud or quietly appreciated. Except we don’t always fully understand what is and isn’t appropriate, so many extras are added “just in case” and they keep themselves in check for the most part (until they don’t).

Anton doing his thing in Kiroshima, Japan

This article is a bit closer to home

https://www.todaysparent.com/blogs/opinion/i-let-my-kids-take-the-bus-by-themselves-until-the-government-said-theyre-too-young-to-ride-alone/

First week on the road

Today  marks our first week on the road. Our internal clocks have finally reset, we’ve gone through all our clean socks and the kids have reached the limits of their noodle fixation, in all its variations, and are ready to branch out into more exotic fare.

Some things I have noticed this week, in no particular order of importance or sequence of events

  1. Using a shower, a hot water dispenser or a toilet is not as intuitive as you might think. It might even turn into an event 
  2. After years of trying to get  kids to wear clothes it is hard to get them to take them off for an Onsen
  3. Peanut cream and peanut butter are not the same but they are both pretty good on super thick white bread
  4. Don’t try to do anything especially if it involves a map, a decision or a mode of transportation between the hours of 5:00 and 6:00 pm.
  5. Never mock the minimalist packer who sacrificed a t shirt for an Aeropress. You will be grateful every morning for his foresight 
  6. A trip to the 7-11 for some juice can be as time consuming and enlightening as a tour of any museum.
  7. A 16 and 10 year old get hungry, a lot. Often. But seldom at the same times
  8. Google translate is the best app ever created
  9. Placing a cream coloured instrument case on a white sofa is a guaranteed method for lightening your load.(and require a return trip to Tokyo to pick up said instrument )
  10. No matter what you plan for the day always bring Gravel tablets, a plastic bag and a packet of wet wipes, especially between the hours of 5:00 and 6:00 pm

-Wanda